UAD 3.6 vs. the 1004: What Actually Changes for Appraisers
By Ankit Patel — Founder of ASSIST, building workflow tools for residential appraisers.
Quick Answer
The legacy 1004 family is a set of fixed forms; under UAD 3.6 the redesigned URAR is one dynamic report that adapts to the property, the assignment, and the scope of work. UAD 3.6 does not replace appraiser judgment or the fundamental valuation process. What changes is how the assignment, property characteristics, scope, and analysis are captured and reported — and, most practically, what you have to collect in the field.
The shorthand is "the forms are going away." That is true and also incomplete. The valuation work is still appraisal work. But the reporting framework is different, and in some areas it requires more granular information than appraisers were accustomed to capturing on the legacy forms.
Fixed forms vs. one dynamic report
Under the legacy model you picked a form to match the assignment: 1004 for a full interior single-family, 1073 for a condo, 2055 for exterior-only, 1004D for updates and completions. Each form carried its own layout, its own quirks, and its own workarounds when the assignment did not fit neatly.
Under UAD 3.6, the redesigned URAR inverts that. The report dynamically presents the sections and data appropriate to the property and assignment, rather than forcing every assignment through a fixed form. Condo-specific content appears when the property is a condo. The structure accounts for the full range of property and inspection types. Many of the workarounds appraisers built over two decades to make a form fit an odd assignment become unnecessary.
One terminology note worth keeping straight: UAD 3.6 is the dataset and reporting standard. The redesigned URAR is the report built on it — alongside the Restricted Appraisal Update Report and the Completion Report.
The form number stops driving the assignment
For decades, appraisers have spoken in form numbers: "It's a 1004." "It's a 1073." "They need a 2055."
UAD 3.6 moves away from that model. The property characteristics, assignment conditions, and scope of work determine what appears in the redesigned URAR, rather than selecting a predefined form number.
That may sound like a small terminology change. It is actually a fundamental shift in how assignments get structured, ordered, and communicated — including in the engagement letters and client conversations you have every week.
Structured data instead of narrative
The second real change is how much of the report is captured as discrete data rather than prose in a comment field. Property characteristics, condition and quality detail, and the reasoning behind adjustments are increasingly expected in standardized form.
For appraisers this cuts both ways. The upside is consistency: less rekeying, fewer ambiguous fields, and reviewers reading the same structure every time. The friction is the other side of the same coin — narrative gave appraisers more flexibility in how information was documented, while structured data requires the information to be captured in the specific fields the report expects.
What does not change
- Your scope-of-work decisions and your professional judgment.
- Your obligations under standards of practice.
- Your responsibility for the credibility of the value opinion. You are still the appraiser of record.
- The fundamental analysis — comparable selection, adjustment reasoning, reconciliation.
Anyone selling UAD 3.6 as a rewrite of how appraisal is developed is overstating it. It is primarily a change to how appraisal is captured and reported — with real consequences for what you collect along the way.
Where the real friction lands
Three places, in the order appraisers actually hit them:
- The inspection. The most expensive mistake may be discovering at your desk that the redesigned URAR requires information you didn't capture in the field. The GSEs published inspection guidance precisely because there are new information requirements. Rebuild the checklist before you rebuild the report-writing routine.
- The learning curve. Your first UAD 3.6 assignments probably won't feel as efficient as the workflow you've used for years. Build room for that instead of discovering it during a busy week.
- The transition period. Some assignments will remain legacy while others move to UAD 3.6. Knowing which workflow applies to each order becomes another thing appraisers have to manage.
How to get ahead of it
Rewrite your inspection checklist first — it is free, it is entirely within your control, and it removes the most expensive failure mode. Then complete real files in the voluntary window so your learning happens on your schedule. Then make sure you have one reliable place to see which orders are in which format and what is due next, so the parallel period does not live in your head.
One place to run the transition
Track order status, formats, deadlines, and client communication in a single workspace while you learn the new report.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between UAD 3.6 and the 1004?
The legacy 1004 is a fixed form with a predetermined layout and fields. Under UAD 3.6, the redesigned URAR is dynamic: property characteristics, assignment details, and scope determine which sections and data are presented rather than a legacy form number.
Which appraisal forms does UAD 3.6 replace?
The redesigned report structure retires the traditional residential form family identified by the GSEs — including the 1004, 1004 Desktop, 1004 Hybrid, the 1073 variants, 1075, 2055, 1004C, 2090, 2095, 1025, 1007 and 1004D, among others. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac publish the full list of retiring forms on their UAD pages.
Does UAD 3.6 change how appraisers develop an opinion of value?
UAD 3.6 does not replace appraiser judgment or the fundamental valuation process. It changes how the assignment, property characteristics, scope, and analysis are captured and reported, and how much of that is captured as standardized data rather than free-form narrative.
Will UAD 3.6 reports take longer to complete?
Expect a learning curve. As appraisers become more familiar with the redesigned report and adjust their inspection workflows, completion times should become more predictable.
Does UAD 3.6 require different data from the inspection?
In many cases, yes. The GSEs have published inspection and reporting guidance because UAD 3.6 includes notable differences in what information needs to be collected during inspection or property research. The most common transition problem is not the software — it is getting back to the desk without a field you now need.

